Proof from customers, in their own words. Production's /reviews says "These are real reviews from G2 and Google, the words are theirs". That's the right promise, so the page keeps it: every quote is exactly as production shows it, with the reviewer's name only. The scores sit in the hero, where a visitor checks them first.
- The scores are flagged until marketing confirms them. G2: I checked g2.com/products/codekeeper on 7 Oct 2026, and it shows 5.0 out of 5 from 3 reviews, which matches production. Google: production shows five stars on each of its 13 quotes, but the Google Business Profile they came from is no longer on Maps, so there's no live average to link to. The chip says "13 reviews, all five stars" rather than claiming a profile average. If the 4.7/5 used elsewhere on production was that profile's average, use it here instead, or drop the Google chip.
- The attribution inconsistency in to-confirm.md applies here. Production shows Jordan Adler's review as "Jordan Adler" on this page and as "Jordan A, Chief Operating Officer" elsewhere. Production's Vendor Risk & Compliance mock also uses "Jordan Adler, Lead analyst" as a fictional analyst name. Fix both before launch.
- Production's hero buttons were "Book a demo" and "Read reviews on G2". The G2 link moves to the G2 section; the hero uses the two standard CTAs.
Reviews
What customers say. In their own words.
Reviews from G2 and Google, quoted as the customers wrote them. Teams use Codekeeper to protect source code, SaaS applications and the deals that depend on them.
Social proof straight after the promise. These are the logos production already uses, loaded from codekeeper.co. Where an image can't load (for example in the preview), the name shows instead. Use the approved set only.
Trusted by 3,500+ teams, from regulated enterprises to fast-growing software vendors
G2 first: it's the live, independent source. Production shows the three G2 review headlines with the reviewer's name and job title. The brief says names only, so the titles (Co-founder & CEO, Marketing manager) are left out; add them back if marketing prefers, since G2 shows them publicly.
- Two of the three headlines are shown. Lara H.'s headline, "Easy-to-Use Platform with Always-Available Sales & Customer Support", is left out: a quote on our own page counts as our claim, and we don't promise always-available support (production's "24/7" was dropped for the same reason). Marketing and legal can restore it if support hours back it up. The G2 link still leads to all three.
- Nikki P.'s full review (quoted on production's /book-a-demo) mentions a REST API and a Salesforce integration, neither confirmed for the new line-up. Only the headline is used here.
On G2
Three verified reviews, all five out of five.
These are the reviewers' own headlines. The full write-ups are on G2.
Responsive, Helpful Team Made Escrow Setup Smooth
Phenomenal Solution for Software Development
Grouped by what customers talk about, so each group answers a buying question. Production lists 13 Google quotes in one column. Here they're grouped: is it easy to set up and keep current, does it work for enterprise deals, and what are the people like. Each quote is exactly as production shows it, with the name only.
- Left out: Fred Cox's review, because it calls the service "compliant". A testimonial on our own page counts as our claim, and "compliant" is on the brief's cut list. Its story is strong (escrow was a hard requirement for their largest prospective client), so ask Fred for permission to use a version without that word.
- Two production inconsistencies: Terence's review appears as Terence "Ned" with "for some tine" on /reviews, and as Terence Hall with "for some time" on /book-a-demo. This page uses the /book-a-demo version. Jordan Adler's attribution issue is noted in the hero.
- Two quotes use "straightforward", a word our own copy avoids. It's the customer's word, so it stays.
- The note under the quotes is production's own disclosure that the Google profile is gone. Keep it: it's honest, and a reader who looks for the profile won't find it. Marketing should decide whether to keep quotes from a delisted profile at all.
On Google
What customers told Google.
Quotes from customers who left a Google review, grouped by what they talk about.
Setting up and staying current
We've had a great experience with CodeKeeper. The setup process was smooth, and the team made everything very straightforward. Knowing our critical software assets are securely protected gives us real peace of mind. Their support has been responsive and professional, and the overall service has been reliable and easy to work with. Highly recommended.
Very smooth and business friendly process to protect assets
Easy to navigate and push the SW with direct link to github
The synchronization and backup process are working satisfactorily, which provides us with great peace of mind.
Great service and application from Codekeeper. Highly recommend.
We've been using Codekeeper for some time and great service. Always good follow up with Helpdesk if required as well.
Escrow for enterprise customers
We worked with Codekeeper as our escrow provider for major enterprise deployments and found them to be extremely professional, responsive, and flexible throughout. I'd highly recommend Codekeeper. They clearly understand the realities of working with growing tech businesses and enterprise customers alike.
Codekeeper provides a brilliant and cost-effective Escrow service that we have relied for our clients over many years.
Roger and team thoroughly helped us to understand the nuances of Code Escrow and helped us customize the offering suited to our requirements. Much recommended.
The demo and the support team
I found Codekeeper's solution excellent for what I need. I scheduled a demo to better understand the possibilities. Very easy! It was a clear and straightforward meeting, focused exactly on what I needed. Excellent service!
The demo was very insightful and helped us to understand our best options!
Lindsey and the Support Team at CodeKeeper are on point. Highly recommend.
Where these come from. These reviews were left on Codekeeper's former Google Business Profile. That listing is no longer on Google Maps.
From short reviews to the longer story. Reviews say customers are happy; case studies show what changed for them. The case studies stay on production for now, so the link goes to the resources hub (keep review, 7 Oct). The suggested film is the "Customer story (regulated buyer)" from the video plan: one named customer on what the certificate did in an audit, which is the story the new line-up sells and something no review here covers yet. It needs a regulated customer who agrees to be named.
The longer story
See what changed for them.
Case studies and guides go further than a review: the situation, the protection and the outcome.
Suggested film
A customer story, in their words
About 90 seconds. A named customer in a regulated business: the application they couldn't lose, why they chose the protection they did, and what the certificate did for them in an audit.
Already use Codekeeper?
Tell other teams how it went. Reviews on G2 help buyers compare providers.
The secondary conversion, on every page. Visitors who aren't ready to talk can still leave their email. The sample evidence pack is the same offer on every page, so the site has one lead magnet instead of a different e-book per page. It also carries the launch story: proof, not promises. The button goes to the sample evidence pack page.
Sample evidence pack
See what your auditor would receive.
An anonymised set of outputs from a real Agentic Verification run, so you can judge the evidence before you talk to us.
- Recoverability Certificate
- Run report
- SBOM and Exit workbook excerpts
The same close on every page. A reviews page ends by offering the same experience the reviewers describe: two of them write about the demo itself. Every page ends on the same two actions in the same order: Book a demo, then the sample evidence pack.
See what they saw. On your applications.
Book a demo and we'll show you the setup, the deposits and the evidence the reviewers talk about.